Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2019
Abstract
Scholars have argued that Senate-approved treaties are becoming increasingly irrelevant in the United States, because their role can be fulfilled by their close but less politically costly cousin, the congressional-executive agreement. This study demonstrates that treaties are more durable than congressional-executive agreements, supporting the view that there are qualitative differences between the two instruments. Abandoning the treaty may therefore lead to unintended consequences by decreasing the tools that the executive has available to design optimal agreements.
Recommended Citation
Julian Nyarko,
Giving the Treaty a Purpose: Comparing the Durability of Treaties and Executive Agreements,
113
Am. J. Int'l L.
54
(2019).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/global_markets_corporate_ownership/40
Comments
© 2019 The American Society of International Law. This article has been published in the American Journal of International Law and is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use.