Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2015
Abstract
Two decisions of the United States Supreme Court announced March 9, unanimous in reversing what had been surprising and potentially disruptive administrative law decisions by the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, could themselves portend rather striking changes in American administrative law. This essay considers Perez v. American Mortgage Bankers, which both overstates Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp, Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and invites reconsideration of so-called Auer deference. (See p. 12 below for analysis of Department of Transportation v. Association of American Railroads.)
Disciplines
Administrative Law | Law
Recommended Citation
Peter L. Strauss,
Recent Developments in Administrative Law: The Tremors of Two March 9, 2015 Supreme Court Decisions, Part I: Perez,
40(4)
Admin. & Reg. L. News
4
(2015).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/4234
Comments
©2015 by the American Bar Association. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association.