Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2002

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1257/000282802320189212

Abstract

While freer trade, or “openness” in trade, is now widely regarded as economically benign, in the sense that it increases the size of the pie, the recent anti-globalization critics have suggested that it is socially malign on several dimensions, among them the question of poverty.

Their contention is that trade accentuates, not ameliorates, and that it deepens, not diminishes, poverty in both the rich and the poor countries. The theoretical and empirical analysis of the impact of freer trade on poverty in the rich and in the poor countries is not symmetric, of course. We focus here only on the latter. In doing so, we distinguish between two different strands of argumentation: static and dynamic.

Disciplines

International Economics | Law | Law and Economics

Comments

Copyright © 2002 by the American Economic Association.

Share

COinS