Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2010

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5305/procannmeetasil.104.0385

Abstract

We sit at an interesting juncture in the evolution (in some cases, devolution) of the idea of sexual rights in international law. For at the very moment that we are experiencing a retraction in both domestic and international commitments to rights associated with sexual and reproductive health, we see sexual rights of a less-reproductive nature gaining greater uptake and acceptance. It is the moral hazard associated with perceived gains in the domain of international rights for lesbians and gay men that I want to address today. In the end, the point I want to bring home is that a particular kind of caution, and indeed a new kind of politics, is called for when the state becomes a partner in the project of converting wrongs into rights and outlaws into rights-bearing citizens. The ''patriotized'' rights-bearing lesbian or gay subject and "its" movement have a duty to actively resist being mustered into nationalist projects undertaken in its name and purportedly on its behalf.

Disciplines

Civil Rights and Discrimination | Gender and Sexuality | International Law | Law | Sexuality and the Law | Social and Behavioral Sciences | Sociology

Comments

© 2010 American Society of International Law. This article has been published in the Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting and is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution or re-use.

Share

COinS