Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2021
Abstract
This reply to For Whom Is the Corporation Managed in 2020? The Debate Over Corporate Purpose by Professor Edward Rock supports his depiction of the current state of corporate law in the United States. But by contrast to Professor Rock, I do not trace the debate over corporate purpose to recent statements by business elites belatedly recognizing that our corporate governance system has failed to work for the many and is contributing to growing inequality. Rather, I source the debate to the work of advocates and scholars who have long been trying to restore fairness to our economy by updating an outdated mid-twentieth century corporate governance system to address evolving market and political developments. Taking a more positive view than Professor Rock, I argue that the most promising corporate governance reform proposals do not involve a revolution, but a restoration. They build on traditional corporate law techniques and restore the balance among stakeholders that characterized governance in the period when the U.S. economy worked best.
Recommended Citation
Leo E. Strine Jr.,
Restoration: The Role Stakeholder Governance Must Play in Recreating a Fair and Sustainable American Economy – A Reply to Professor Rock,
76
Bus. Law.
397
(2021).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/global_markets_corporate_ownership/41
Included in
Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons
Comments
©2021 by the American Bar Association. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved. This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association.