Recent scholarship in the field of contract law has concentrated on contractual incompleteness-that is, on the fact that except in the simplest and most basic transactions, contracting parties do not work out all of the relevant details and contingencies of their relationship at the outset. The reasons for incomplete contracts are varied. Sometimes parties deliberately leave terms unresolved, trusting future negotiations or social norms to fill in any problems that emerge. Other times, they leave terms unresolved without realizing they have done so, in part because they devote limited attention or resources to their negotiations and in part because contracts are expressed in ordinary language with all its ambiguities. In any event, it is routine for contracting parties not to focus on the fact that their agreements contain interpretative gaps until after a difference of opinion arises.
Contracts | Law
Avery W. Katz,
Contractual Incompleteness: A Transactional Perspective,
Case W. Res. L. Rev.
Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/3415