Advancing Socioeconomic Rights Through Interdisciplinary Factfinding: Opportunities and Challenges
Human Rights Law | Law
The human rights movement is increasingly using interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, mixed-methods, and quantitative factfinding. There has been too little analysis of these shifts. This article examines some of the opportunities and challenges of these methods, focusing on the investigation of socio-economic human rights. By potentially expanding the amount and types of evidence available, factfinding's accuracy and persuasiveness can be strengthened, bolstering rights claims. However, such methods can also present significant challenges and may pose risks in individual cases and to the human rights movement generally. Interdisciplinary methods can be costly in human, financial, and technical resources; are sometimes challenging to implement; may divert limited resources from other work; can reify inequalities; may produce “expertise” that disempowers rightsholders; and could raise investigation standards to an infeasible or counterproductive level. This article includes lessons learned and questions to guide researchers and human rights advocates considering mixed-methods human rights factfinding.
Sarah Knuckey, Joshua D. Fisher, Amanda M. Klasing, Tess Russo & Margaret Satterthwaite,
Advancing Socioeconomic Rights Through Interdisciplinary Factfinding: Opportunities and Challenges,
Ann. Rev. L. & Soc. Sci.
Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2950