This essay explores one of the most important, but occasionally intractable, issues under the Berne Convention, the concept of Country of Origin. Article 5(4) of that treaty defines a work’s country of origin, but leaves out several situations, leaving those who interpret and apply the treaty without guidance in ascertaining the country of origin. I will call those situations the “Conundra of the country of origin,” and will explore two of them here. First, what is the country of origin of an unpublished work whose authors are nationals of different countries? Second, what is the country of origin of a work exclusively made available over digital networks? In both situations, in the absence of treaty specification, the work may have multiple countries of origin. A plurality of countries of origin may be problematic because, under Berne art. 5(3) “Protection in the country of origin is governed by domestic law.” Berne minimum protections do not apply to local works in their countries of origin. As a result, the greater the number of countries of origin, the fewer the number of countries in which the work must receive the minimum Conventional coverage. Even where minimum protections may apply, variations in the country of origin can affect the calculus of copyright term under art. 7(8), the availability of coverage for works of applied art under art. 2(7), and claims to artists’ resale royalties under art. 14ter; in all those cases, the availability of protection turns not on national treatment, but on reciprocity with the country of origin.
Intellectual Property Law | Internet Law | Law | Public Law and Legal Theory
Jane C. Ginsburg,
Conundra of the Berne Convention Concept of the Country of Origin,
Festskrift til Jørgen Blomqvist, Morten Rosenmeier, Thomas Riis, Jens Schovsbo & Henrik Udsen (Eds.), Ex Tuto Publishing A/S, 2021; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-684
Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2733
Intellectual Property Law Commons, Internet Law Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons