The University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class symposium on problem-solving courts surfaced a wide array of issues on the meaning and practices of these courts. My prepared remarks at the symposium addressed the first issue discussed in this article: the potential disparate impact of problem-solving courts on minority families who are disproportionately affected by these court processes. The second part of the article draws on the discussion during the symposium to reflect on the difficulty supporters and critics of the problem-solving court movement have in talking and listening to each other.
Jane M. Spinak,
A Conversation about Problem-Solving Courts: Take 2,
Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender & Class, Vol. 10, p. 113, 2010; New York Law School Clinical Research Institute Research Paper No. 10/11 #5; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 10-245
Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2499