John Hart Ely's Democracy and Distrust is an ambitious attempt to create a new theory of judicial review, breaking away from both "interpretivism" and "noninterpretivism"-a division Professor Ely regards as a "false dichotomy" (p. vii). The book is brilliant and provocative, so much so that one fears less that its faults will be obscured-there is little danger that polemic critics will fail to pounce on them-than that the flash of Professor Ely's reasoning and the controversy it generates will distract us from the genuine importance of the insight that powers his analysis.
Gerard E. Lynch,
Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review,
Colum. L. Rev.
Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2121