Document Type
Working Paper
Publication Date
2017
Abstract
In Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve confusion in the lower courts regarding the “separability” predicate to copyright protection of decorative features of useful articles. The case involved the “surface decorations” of stripes, chevrons, and color blocks applied to cheerleader uniforms. While the Supreme Court clarified the meaning and application of the “separability” standard for the kinds of decorative elements there at issue, the fate of other artistic “features” of useful articles, particularly their three dimensional forms, remains murky. Much of the Court’s analysis points toward a prophylactic rule excluding the entire shape of a useful article, but some aspects of the majority opinion indicate that the Court has yet to devise a coherent application of the statutory standard.
Disciplines
Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law | Intellectual Property Law | Law
Center/Program
Kernochan Center for Law, Media and the Arts
Recommended Citation
Jane C. Ginsburg,
The Whole is More Public Domain than the Parts?: US Copyright Protection for Works of Applied Art Under Star Athletica's Imagination Test,
University of Pennsylvania Law Review Online, Vol. 166, p. 83, 2017; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-558
(2017).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2054