Although common economic wisdom suggests that government bailouts are inefficient because they reduce incentives to avoid failure and induce excessive entry by marginal firms, in practice bailouts are difficult to avoid for systemically significant enterprises. Recent experience suggests that bailouts also induce litigation from shareholders and managers complaining about expropriation and wrongful termination by the government. Our model shows how governments can design tax-financed corporate bailouts to reduce these distortions and points to the causes of inefficiencies in real-world implementations such as the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Bailouts with minimal distortion depend critically on the government’s ability to expropriate shareholders and terminate managers.
Antonio E. Bernardo, Eric L. Talley & Ivo Welch,
Designing Corporate Bailouts,
Journal of Law & Economics, Vol. 59, p. 75, 2016
Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1839