Beccaria’s treatise "On Crimes and Punishments" (1764) has become a placeholder for the classical school of thought in criminology, for deterrence-based public policy, for death penalty abolitionism, and for liberal ideals of legality and the rule of law. A source of inspiration for Bentham and Blackstone, an object of praise for Voltaire and the Philosophies, a target of pointed critiques by Kant and Hegel, the subject of a genealogy by Foucault, the object of derision by the Physiocrats, rehabilitated and appropriated by the Chicago School of law and economics – these ricochets and reflections on Beccaria’s treatise reveal multiple dimensions of Beccaria’s work and provide an outline of a history of the foundations of modern criminal law. In becoming a classic text that has been so widely and varyingly cited, though perhaps little read today, "On Crimes and Punishments" may be used as a mirror on the key projects over the past two centuries and a half in the domain of penal law and punishment theory – and this essay hopes to contribute, in a small way, to such an endeavor. In the end, we may learn as much about those who have appropriated and used Beccaria than we would about Beccaria himself – perhaps more.
Criminal Law | Law | Law and Philosophy | Law Enforcement and Corrections
Columbia Center for Contemporary Critical Thought
Bernard E. Harcourt,
Beccaria's On Crimes and Punishments: A Mirror on the History of the Foundations of Modern Criminal Law,
Foundational Texts in Modern Criminal Law, Markus Dubber, Ed., pp. 39-59, Oxford University Press, 2014; University of Chicago Coase-Sandor Institute for Law & Economics Research Paper No. 648; University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper No. 433; Columbia Law & Economics Working Paper No. 455
Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1816