Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1988
Abstract
With its decision in Société Nationale Industrielle Aérospatiale v. United States District Court, the United States Supreme Court resolved what had been widely regarded as "one of the most difficult and important issues in international civil litigation in United States courts." This opportunity arose out of the divergence of views among American courts on the proper way to reconcile the need for full disclosure of evidence with respect for the sensitivities of foreign states where that evidence might be located. The case before the Supreme Court, like many lower court cases, dealt specifically with the impact of the Hague Evidence Convention on the resolution of this tension. As formulated at the outset of Justice Stevens' majority opinion, the question was whether and to what extent a federal court must resort to the procedures set out in the Convention when litigants seek discovery of information located abroad from a party over whom the court has personal jurisdiction.
Disciplines
Comparative and Foreign Law | International Law | Law | Supreme Court of the United States
Recommended Citation
George A. Bermann,
The Hague Evidence Convention in the Supreme Court: A Critique of the Aérospatiale Decision,
63
Tul. L. Rev.
525
(1988).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/710
Included in
Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, International Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons