A Reply to "Hollow Spaces"

Authors

George A. Bermann, Columbia Law SchoolFollow
Jack J. Coe Jr., Pepperdine University School of LawFollow
Christopher R. Drahozal, University of Kansas School of LawFollow
Catherine A. Rogers, Pennsylvania State University Law SchoolFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2014

Abstract

This short essay responds to Chip Brower's thoughtful and meticulous critique of Tentative Draft No. 2 of the Restatement Third of the U.S. Law of International Commercial Arbitration. While we appreciate the concerns he raises, we disagree with the conclusions he draws both about the Restatement and the drafting process. We address here what we understand to be Professor Brower's major criticisms of the work.

Disciplines

Commercial Law | Comparative and Foreign Law | Dispute Resolution and Arbitration | International Law | Law

Recommended Citation

George A. Bermann, Jack J. Coe Jr., Christopher R. Drahozal & Catherine A. Rogers, A Reply to "Hollow Spaces", 62 Buff. L. Rev. 177 (2014).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2561