Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2009

Abstract

What do we say about the reform work we do, and to what degree is what we say accurate? How does the way in which we talk about family court reform implicate our analysis of what we are achieving? How does our place or role within the system affect our perceptions of reform? What limits our willingness and ability to apply rigorous evaluative techniques to determine whether we are reaching our goals? And if we are failing, can we acknowledge failure and learn from it? Answering these questions may lead to a better understanding of why family court reform is stuck between rhetoric and reality.

Disciplines

Courts | Family Law | Law

Comments

The Washington University Journal of Law & Policy is published three times a year by the students of Washington University School of Law, St. Louis, Missouri 63130. Library of Congress Control Number sn99049212, ISSN 1533-4686 (Print) and ISSN 1943-0000 (Online).

Materials contained within may be duplicated for educational purposes if: (1) each copy is distributed at or below its duplication cost; (2) the author and the Journal are identified; (3) proper notice of copyright is affixed to each copy; and (4) the Journal receives notice of use.

Share

COinS