Dancy's main thesis is that the conclusion of practical reasoning is an action, and indeed that makes the reasoning practical. I trace his argument, suggest improvements to its superficial deficiencies, and conclude that it fails because Dancy misunderstands the nature of reasoning.
Law | Law and Philosophy
On Dancy’s Account of Practical Reasoning,
Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 50/2019; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-636
Available at: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2459