Document Type
Working Paper
Publication Date
2019
Abstract
Dancy's main thesis is that the conclusion of practical reasoning is an action, and indeed that makes the reasoning practical. I trace his argument, suggest improvements to its superficial deficiencies, and conclude that it fails because Dancy misunderstands the nature of reasoning.
Disciplines
Law | Law and Philosophy
Recommended Citation
Joseph Raz,
On Dancy’s Account of Practical Reasoning,
Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 50/2019; Columbia Public Law Research Paper No. 14-636
(2019).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2459